the world over the sea. I note how you dishonestly seek to muddy the waters by falsely extending the _meta_phor. The
... read more »

<snip Bigots seek to have others live the way they believe they should live their lives. Yes. You are a bigot. I do not seek that. And a liar. Speak about yourself again, I see. You, Calum Sawyers/Bennachie, are a lying
... read more »

<snip You, Calum Sawyers/Bennachie, are a lying scumbag. (Hmmmmmnnnnn...I have no trouble communicating that fact but Calum has problems understanding that fact...hmmmmmmmnnnnnn). As I said above, and showed that you admitted it, you do have communication problems.  It appears that I am not the only one who has difficulty understanding what you say/mean.  And of course, then, when you are misunderstood because of your difficulty in expressing yourself, you start accusing people of misrepresenting you, and then abuse them until they
... read more »

forcing them to either shut up or agree with you, False: whom have I shut up? who has agreed with me? How can I force anything or anyone simply by posting to this ng? Or
... read more »

your answer not only demonstrated your monumental ignorance of the issue under discussion but consisted of
... read more »

 <news:est9b.1548$ This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it David Bisman < This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it wrote in message And you accuse me of not being able to communicate! You use common terms but not the way anyone else does and not with their common meaning. You confuse 'real' with 'true' and you seem to think that the phrase 'false truths ' is something other than a semantic nullity. BTW, who are you quoting? As you yourself have admitted very recently in other threads, you have difficulty  communicating  and understanding what others are saying.  I need not accuse you of being unable to communicate-  you have said it yourself. You are lying. I have admitted no such thing in other threads . You are a lying scumbag. In message news: This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it on 15/09/2003 at 06.29 in the thread Re: Religion is the real demon you said I clearly did not adequately express myself  for you to have so completely misunderstood .  Your admission is that you are unable to express  yourself adequately.  It seems I am not the only one who has problems with you trying to express  yourself. At least there, you admitted it.  You were unable to communicate what you meant.  You admitted  it. It appears that again, when you say You are a lying scumbag , you are again talking about  yourself. It seems you have some self esteem issues David.  Not remembering what you said, accusing others  of misrepresenting you when you cannot express yourself adequately for others to understand you ... Finally we see graphically illustrated your infacility with the English language and your total inability understand the written word and your complete lack of logic! You stated that I had admitted something in other threads (note the plural) then, when challenged, you posted a single (not plural) example of something else! In the case of what you quoted I acknowledged (admission was not an issue as it was never relevant to the thread at issue) that I had not made a single point clear in a single post. You have seized on this to justify your multiple incomprehensions. This is extrapolating from the parlicular to the general and is an argument from flawed logic. You have accused me of some appalling things in your attempts to justify your repeated lies but every time you have actually tried to justify your lies by quotation you have demonstrated beyond doubt what an ignorant, lying, abusive person you really are. I am not surprised that you should seize upon my apology for a mistake to try to lord it over me as you clearly lack the balls to acknowledge, let alone apologise for, your mistakes (multitudinous though they be) and see such as a sign of weakness. Your ignorance is overwhelming and only exceeded by your monumental dishonesty. <snip You admitted it.  It was your admission, and now you deny it.  <ironyWhat a surprise</irony* (*not a _meta_llic substance) I have tried reason, I have tried facts, I have tried firmness, I have tried shock, I have tried everything in my repertoire. You have responded with abuse and lies and incomprehension and absurdities: you have insisted that poetry and even alliteration is always fiction! You have tried to dictate what I think. You have shown you ignorance by describing hyroglyphics as pyramid writing and insisted, against reason, that you were quoting authorities, you have distorted what i said you have posted private correspondence without permission, you have repeatedly lied, you have confused what? with when? . You have insulted me and demeaned my religion. You have confused the particular with the general and you have accused me of intimidation but refused to offer a shred of proof. I am sick of it so I decline to further discuss this, or anything with you until such time as you choose to tell the truth. As far as I am concerned this correspondence is henceforth closed. Of course you will post a follow up as you are incapable, even after this, of not having the last word, wherein you will claim ultimate victory. You will be both wrong and pathetic. Goodbye Calum and I sincerely hope you get better soon. Cheers David Bisman Dunedin New Zealand